channelterew.blogg.se

1. ADOBE LIGHTROOM 6 VS NIKON CAPTURE NX2 PHOTO EDITING INSTALL
2. ADOBE LIGHTROOM 6 VS NIKON CAPTURE NX2 PHOTO EDITING 64 BIT
3. ADOBE LIGHTROOM 6 VS NIKON CAPTURE NX2 PHOTO EDITING UPGRADE
4. ADOBE LIGHTROOM 6 VS NIKON CAPTURE NX2 PHOTO EDITING REGISTRATION
5. ADOBE LIGHTROOM 6 VS NIKON CAPTURE NX2 PHOTO EDITING PRO

How many times will we actually use the new clone tool (we are pretty efficient with the old clone tool). The reality of it, CS5 doesn't do much more for me than my CS3 (some may disagree but I ask those to produce something that my artists can not do). With Adobe products, they introduce 1 key feature (like the amazing clone tool), a bunch of small specialized things that will be used like once a year if ever and a ton of bug fixes from the previous version.

They also release many service packs for several years that quash bugs even for previous versions. If it consistently saves me time then it makes me money and its worth upgrading. The reason their is no bitching there is that the upgrades are significant with a ton of new features that everyone will use.

ADOBE LIGHTROOM 6 VS NIKON CAPTURE NX2 PHOTO EDITING UPGRADE

Every year I upgrade Vectorworks Architect with Renderworks. I keep most of my huge library of software current. Lightroom's biggest advantage is that it's available across both BEIGE, Lightroom has a few advantages, but this is not one of them. Aperture has the histogram and it allows per channel editing.

In terms of the article, I don't see how you can claim Lightroom's curves implementation is on par with Aperture's. To that end, I'd be curious to see some sort of repeatable benchmark to illustrate your point. However, there is no noticeable difference for me. That could be because I'm using significant hardware and not bare bones systems, etc. Having used both, I'm not seeing the performance issue you keep talking about. Lightroom makes me feel like I'm using different programs, depending on the module / function I'm using. For me, I much prefer Aperture's importing and more intuitive interface. I'll certainly acknowledge that both programs are excellent and generally on par with each other. It converts 6 pages to 1 and shows the article in much better type, etc.Īnyway, the preference for Aperture or Lightroom generally comes down to the preference of the user interface and overall workflow. articles like this are really making me love Safari's Reader function. Jim OK, they haven't produced these machines in several years now, but the G5 Quad was a really nice machine and I thought it was reasonable to expect a five- or six-year life out of it.įor starters, I have to say. Your reviews really help me weigh the two to decide whether it's worth the jump. They've made huge leaps recently and I'm very close to jumping no matter the pain. The performance issue has had me looking hard at Lightroom for years, and I sure do like their editing model better than Apple's fixed stack of processors, but I always hated the images it produced, same as with Photoshop historically. Tack on to that Apple dropping support for PPC for Aperture 3, and it's about a $4000 upgrade for me. I have been disappointed in Apple's support of Aperture I love the images it produces (most of the time anyway) and I like the modeless UI model but performance is beyond lackluster even on very nice hardware and it is difficult to spend (reasonable amounts of) money to improve it given limited GPU options.

ADOBE LIGHTROOM 6 VS NIKON CAPTURE NX2 PHOTO EDITING REGISTRATION

Forum nick, registration email & IP address added to the database. h++p:///acai-max-cleanse ( spam link edited by moderator) Adobe can come up with a beta version for LR3 that is 64 bit, but they can’t do the same for their flash program.

ADOBE LIGHTROOM 6 VS NIKON CAPTURE NX2 PHOTO EDITING 64 BIT

I use Windows 7 64 bit, and much prefer to run actual 64 bit applications.

ADOBE LIGHTROOM 6 VS NIKON CAPTURE NX2 PHOTO EDITING INSTALL

However, what really caught my attention with LR3 over Capture NX2, is the ability to install a 64 bit version so that you can run a 64 bit on a 64 bit platform, rather than running it as x86 on a 64 bit OS. I was using Nikon’s Capture NX2, which is a fine piece of software in its own right, but it does not compare to LR3. I agree about the lack of a proper cloning tool, but other than that I must say that I am quite pleased and impressed by the way LR3 handles my NEF Raw files.

I had once used Elements 7 but was not impressed. I recently installed Lightroom 3, and it is my first time using it. Where version 2 uses native OS X widgets, the new import window is a larger, beefier, Lightroom-style window with a better layout and a disk browser for picking import source and destination. Lightroom 3's interface didn't get any sweeping changes, but there is an updated importer in version 3.

ADOBE LIGHTROOM 6 VS NIKON CAPTURE NX2 PHOTO EDITING PRO

Let's jump right in and see what else Lightroom 3 has to offer. Lightroom 3 may not be knee-deep in new features, but the Camera RAW 6 stuff alone has the potential to save people a lot of time. Nevertheless, anticipation has been high for this release because of the notable improvements in noise reduction. After a public beta and the release of Camera RAW 6 over a month ago, Lightroom 3's feature set wasn't the best-kept secret.